PRODUCTIVITY OF SPRING CAMELINA DEPENDING ON VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS OF MINERAL NUTRITION AND BIOPREPARATIONS
DOI 10.12737/2782-490X-2025-57-63 УДК 633.85
Keywords:
spring camelina (Camelina sativa), yield structure, weight of 1000 seeds, biological yield, oil content, biopreparations, mineral fertilizersAbstract
The studies were conducted to assess the effect of various backgrounds of mineral nutrition and biopreparations on the growth processes and productivity of spring camelina. Field experiments were carried out on gray
forest medium loamy soils. In the soils of the experimental site, the humus content (according to Tyurin) was low - 3.0%,
mobile phosphorus and exchangeable potassium (according to Kirsanov) were very high (more than 250 mg/kg) and increased (145 mg/kg), respectively, pHsol. - 6.6. The object of the experiment was crops of spring camelina of Crystal variety, growing in the experimental field of Agrobiotechnopark of Kazan State Agrarian University (2020-2022). The twofactor field experiment included the following variants: mineral nutrition background (factor A) – control (without NPK), NPK background calculated for the planned yield of 1.5 t/ha of oilseeds, NPK background calculated for the planned yield
of 2.0 t/ha of oilseeds; plant treatment with biopreparations during vegetation (factor B) – control (without biopreparations), Nodix Premium, 0.3 l/ha, Extrasol, 2 l/ha, Biocomposite-correct, 2 l/ha. The maximum yield indicators in the field
experiments were recorded in the NPK background variants of 2.0 t/ha of oilseeds with the application of Extrasol and
Biocomposite-correct biopreparations during vegetation (1.95 and 2.12 t/ha, respectively), which is 14.7 and 24.7% higher
than the control variant. These variants also had the maximum gross yield of vegetable oil - 766 and 831 kg/ha, which is
12.3 and 22.2 percent higher than the control. The fat content in the seeds in the experiments decreased as the yield increased. Thus, the maximum oil content was in the variant without the introduction of mineral fertilizers and biopreparations - 40.5%, and the minimum was in the variant with NPK background at 2.0 t/ha of oil seeds + Biocomposite-correct,
2 l/ha - 39.2%.
For citation: Suleymanov S. R., Ismagilova E. F. Productivity of spring camelina depending on various backgrounds
of mineral nutrition and biopreparations// Agrobiotechnologies and digital farming. 2025. 1(13). 57-63p.
References
Першаков А.Ю., Демин Е.А., Волкова Н.А. Урожайность и масличность рыжика, возделываемого в
условиях лесостепной зоны Зауралья // Вестник Мичуринского государственного аграрного университета.
№ 3(74). С. 41-46.
Евтишина Е. В., Лупова Е.И. Урожайность сортов рыжика ярового при разном уровне минерального
питания в условиях Нечерноземья // Агрохимический вестник. 2020. № 6. С. 35-37. doi: 10.24411/1029-2551-
-10082.
Гулидова В. А. Изучение элементов технологии ярового рыжика в лесостепи Центрального Черноземья // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2021. № 2(205). С. 33-40. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-205-02-33-40.
Турина Е.Л., Ефименко С.Г., Турин Е. Н. Урожайность и качество масла рыжика ярового в зависимости от сроков сева и норм высева в Крыму // Таврический вестник аграрной науки. 2022. № 1(29).
С. 155-165.
Прахов В.А., Батрякова Л.П. Влияние удобрений на урожайные свойства рыжика ярового в условиях
Среднего Поволжья // Сурский вестник. 2018. № 2(2). С. 20-23.
Тулькубаева С. А. Особенности возделывания ярового рыжика на севере Казахстана // Достижения
науки и техники АПК. 2017. Т. 31, № 8. С. 35-37.
Тулькубаева С.А., Васин В.Г. Формирование урожайности и качество семян ярового рыжика при использовании регуляторов роста // Известия Самарской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии.
№ 2. С. 3-7. doi: 10.12737/article_58f0bad25edb01.10070911.
Кузнецова Г.Н., Полякова Р.С. Сурепица и рыжик - скороспелые масличные культуры // Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. 2017. № 3. С. 44-46.
Приемы повышения продуктивности рыжика посевного (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) в условиях Нечерноземной зоны России / Д. В. Виноградов, Ю.А. Мажайский, Е.В. Евтишина, Е.И. Лупова // Российская
сельскохозяйственная наука. 2019. № 4. С. 18-21. doi: 10.31857/S2500-26272019418-21.
Сотников Б.А., Кравченко В.А. Разработка технологии возделывания рыжика посевного на основе
изучения адаптивности сортов в условиях формирования дерново-подзолистых почв // International Agricultural Journal. 2022. Т. 65, № 4. DOI: 10.55186/25876740_2022_6_4_23.
Прахова Т.Я., Вельмисева Л.Е. Влияние удобрений на продуктивность рыжика посевного // Зерновое
хозяйство России. – 2015. № 5. С. 27-30.
Мусынов К.М., Аринов Б.К., Абышева Г.Т. Урожайность семян рыжика в зависимости от применения различных препаратов и сроков посева на севере Казахстана // Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 2022. Т. 52, № 2. С. 105-112. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2022-2-12.
Плужникова И.И. Прахова Т.Я. Влияние фунгицидов на пораженность болезнями рыжика озимого //
Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. 2021. № 6(384). С. 38-41. doi: 10.24412/2587-6740-2021-6-
-41.
Прахова Т.Я., Турина Е.Л. Влияние климатических условий на масличность и качество маслосемян
рыжика озимого // Аграрный научный журнал. 2023. № 2. С. 48-53. doi: 10.28983/asj.y2022i2pp48-53.
Влияние фонов питания горчицы белой на физико-химические свойства черноземов и урожайность
последующей культуры полевого севооборота в Республике Татарстан / А. А. Ахметзянов, А. З. Каримов,
Ф. Н. Сафиоллин, С. Р. Сулейманов // Плодородие. 2020 № 3(114). С. 32-34. doi: 10.25680/
S19948603.2020.114.10.
Mussynov K. M., Abysheva G.T. Yield and quality of spring camelina seeds in the conditions of northern
kazakhstan // Herald of Science of S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. 2022. No. 4-1(115). P. 4-11. DOI:
51452/kazatu.2022.4.1199.
Development and spread of diseases in spring camelina (Camelina sativa (l.) grantz) when using various
treatments / Y. A. Utelbayev, G. T. Abysheva, B. B. Bazarbayev [et al.] // OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences.
Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 288-298. DOI: 10.3844/ojbsci.2021.288.298.
Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different
artificial shade levels using a modified membership function / Ya. Wang, J. Yu, Ya. Gao [et al.] // Frontiers in Plant
Science. 2022. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.978932
Pershakov AYu, Demin EA, Volkova NA. [Productivity and oil content of camelina cultivated in the forest-steppe
zone of the Urals]. Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023; 3(74). 41-46 p.
Evtishina EV, Lupova EI. [Productivity of spring camelina varieties with different levels of mineral nutrition in the
Non-Black earth region]. Agrokhimicheskiy vestnik. 2020; 6. 35-37 p. doi: 10.24411/1029-2551-2020-10082.
Gulidova VA. [Study of elements of spring camelina technology in the forest-steppe of the Central Black earth region]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2021; 2(205). 33-40 p. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-205-02-33-40.
Turina EL, Efimenko SG, Turin EN. [Productivity and quality of spring camelina oil depending on sowing dates and
seeding rates in Crimea]. Tavricheskiy vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2022; 1(29). 155-165 p.
Prakhov VA, Batryakova LP. [Influence of fertilizers on the yield properties of spring camelina in the conditions of
Volga region]. Surskiy vestnik. 2018; 2(2). 20-23 p.
Tulkubaeva SA. [Features of spring camelina cultivation in the north of Kazakhstan]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki
APK. 2017; Vol.31. 8. 35-37 p.
Tulkubaeva SA, Vasin VG. [Formation of yield and quality of spring camelina seeds using growth regulators].
Izvestiya Samarskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii. 2017; 2. 3-7 p. doi: 10.12737/
article_58f0bad25edb01.10070911.
Kuznetsova GN, Polyakova RS. [Rape and camelina - early maturing oilseeds]. Mezhdunarodnuy selskokhozyaystvennuy zhurnal. 2017; 3. 44-46 p.
Vinogradov DV, Mazhayskiy YuA, Evtishina EV, Lupova EI. [Methods for increasing the productivity of camelina
(Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) in the conditions of the Non-Chernozem zone of Russia]. Rossiyskaya selskokhozyaystvennaya nauka. 2019; 4. 18-21 p. doi: 10.31857/S2500-26272019418-21.
Sotnikov BA, Kravchenko VA. [Development of camelina cultivating technology based on the study of the adaptability of varieties in the conditions of the formation of sod-podzolic soils]. International Agricultural Journal. 2022;
Vol.65. 4. DOI: 10.55186/25876740_2022_6_4_23.
Prakhova TYa, Velmiseva LE. [Effect of fertilizers on camelina productivity]. Zernovoe khozyaystvo Rossii.
; 5. 27-30 p.
Musunov KM, Arinov BK, Abysheva GT. [The productivity of camelina seeds depending on the use of various
preparations and sowing dates in the north of Kazakhstan]. Sibirskiy vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2022; Vol.52.
105-112 p. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2022-2-12.
Pluzhnikova II, Prakhova TYa. [Effect of fungicides on the incidence of diseases of camelina winter]. Mezhdunarodnuy selskokhozyaystvennuy zhurnal. 2021; 6(384). 38-41 p. doi: 10.24412/2587-6740-2021-6-38-41.
Prakhova TYa, Turina EL. [Influence of climatic conditions on the oil content and quality of winter camelina oil
seeds]. Agrarnuy nauchnuy zhurnal. 2023; 2. 48-53 p. doi: 10.28983/asj.y2022i2pp48-53.
Akhmetzyanov AA, Karimov AZ, Safiollin FN, Suleymanov SR. [Influence of white mustard nutrition backgrounds on the physicochemical properties of chernozems and the yield of the subsequent crop of field crop rotation in the
Republic of Tatarstan]. Plodorodie. 2020; 3(114). 32-34 p. doi: 10.25680/S19948603.2020.114.10.
Mussynov KM, Abysheva GT. Yield and quality of spring camelina seeds in the conditions of northern Kazakhstan. Herald of Science of S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. 2022; No.4-1(115). 4-11 p. DOI: 10.51452/
kazatu.2022.4.1199.
Utelbayev YA, Abysheva GT, Bazarbaev BB. Development and spread of diseases in spring camelina (Camelina
sativa (L.) Grantz) when using various treatments. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021; Vol.21. No.4. 288-298 p.
DOI: 10.3844/ojbsci.2021.288.298.
Wang Ya, Gao JYuYa. Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring camelina (Camelina sativa (L.)
Grantz) genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function. Frontiers in Plant Science.
; Vol.13. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.978932.
